In special education, Individualized Education Programs (IEPs) play a crucial role in ensuring that students with disabilities receive the support they need to succeed academically and socially. One important aspect of developing an effective IEP is determining when to include related services. Related services are specialized supports and interventions that help students with disabilities fully benefit from their educational program. In this blog post, we will explore the factors that special education teachers should consider when deciding whether or not to include related services in an IEP. Additionally, we will address the impact of technological advancements on the inclusion of related services.
According to the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA), related services are supportive services that assist students with disabilities in achieving their educational goals. These services go beyond the general education curriculum and address specific areas of need. The decision to include related services in an IEP is based on the individual needs of the student and should be determined through a collaborative process with the rest of the IEP Team.
The primary factor to consider when determining whether to include related services in an IEP is the individual needs of the student. Special education teachers should thoroughly assess the student’s strengths, weaknesses, and specific challenges. For example, a student with a speech and language impairment may require speech therapy as a related service to improve their communication skills.
Another important factor to consider is the impact of the related service on the student’s educational performance. The related service should directly address a barrier or limitation that hinders the student’s ability to participate and progress in the general education curriculum. For instance, occupational therapy may be included in an IEP if a student with fine motor difficulties requires support to develop handwriting skills necessary for academic success.
Check out this short snippet from one of the trainings inside of TII membership about qualifying for speech:
The membership also provides guidance on Having an Organized IEP Process, which can be challenging for anyone!
You can join The Intentional IEP to gain access to over 150+ different IEP related trainings, and access to our IEP Goal Bank. Click the image above to join!
The principle of Least Restrictive Environment (LRE) emphasizes the inclusion of students with disabilities in regular education settings to the greatest extent possible. When considering related services, special education teachers must ensure that they align with the LRE principle. If the related service can be effectively provided within the general education environment without isolating the student or impeding their access to typical peers, it may not need to be included in the IEP.
Collaboration with parents and other professionals is vital during the IEP development process. Special education teachers should seek input from parents regarding their child’s needs and goals. Additionally, input from other professionals, such as occupational therapists, speech-language pathologists, or physical therapists, can provide valuable insights into the necessity of related services.
To determine the effectiveness of a related service, it is essential to establish measurable goals and regularly monitor the student’s progress. Special education teachers should document data and evidence showing the impact of the related service on the student’s educational outcomes. If progress monitoring indicates that the related service is no longer necessary or has been successfully integrated into the general education program, it may be appropriate to modify or discontinue it in subsequent IEPs.
Related services encompass a wide range of specialized interventions and supports that cater to diverse student needs. Here are some examples of related services commonly included in IEPs:
With advancements in technology and increased access to resources across the board, many districts now provide a 1-1 technology initiative where each student has access to a device such as a laptop or tablet. This initiative has greatly impacted the inclusion of related services in IEPs. Previously, certain interventions or accommodations that were considered related services, such as assistive technology devices or software, may now be commonplace for all students.
Special education teachers should carefully evaluate whether a particular technology or resource is available universally or if it specifically addresses a unique need for an individual student. For example, while all students may have access to word-processing software for writing assignments, a student with dyslexia may require specialized text-to-speech software as a related service.
Including related services in an IEP is a critical decision that requires careful consideration of various factors. By assessing individual needs, evaluating the impact on educational performance, ensuring consistency with LRE principles, seeking input from parents and professionals, and documenting progress monitoring, special education teachers can make informed decisions about including related services in an IEP. With advancements in technology, it is important to differentiate between universal resources and specialized interventions when determining whether a related service is necessary. Ultimately, the goal is to create an inclusive educational environment that maximizes each student’s potential through tailored supports and interventions.
© The Intentional IEP. 2024. All rights reserved.
