If you’ve ever sat in an IEP meeting and heard the term “PLOP” used as though everyone automatically understands it, you’re not alone. The PLOP, or the Present Levels section of the IEP, is one of the most important parts of an IEP – if not the most important, yet it’s also one of the most misunderstood. A strong PLOP can drive meaningful goals and services. A weak PLOP can quietly undermine the entire plan.
Let’s walk through what a PLOP actually is, what it is not, and what high-quality examples look like in real life.
What Does PLOP Mean
PLOP stands for Present Levels of Performance. In simple terms, it describes how a student is functioning right now. It should paint a clear picture of the student’s current academic, behavioral, social, and functional skills and explain how their disability affects their access to and progress in learning.
A well-written PLOP is grounded in current, relevant data, not opinion or assumptions. It should be informed by multiple sources, such as classroom observations, work samples, formal and informal assessments, progress monitoring data, teacher input, parent input, and student voice. The goal is accuracy, clarity, and usefulness — not just compliance.
A Strong PLOP
A strong PLOP is specific, measurable, and descriptive. It tells the IEP team exactly what the student can do and under what conditions.
For example, instead of saying:
Maria struggles with reading.
A stronger PLOP statement would be:
Maria reads third-grade narrative text at 70 words correct per minute.
That one sentence provides a clear baseline that can be used to develop meaningful goals. The examples provided in your document follow this same pattern — they are concrete, observable, and useful.
A strong PLOP also explains what supports help the student be successful. For example:
John follows classroom rules when provided with visual cues.
This tells the team both how the student is performing and what strategies are working, which directly informs accommodations and instructional planning.
Functional skills can and should be clearly defined as well. An example might be:
Carmen uses one-word utterances to communicate wants and needs.
This type of statement gives the IEP team a clear starting point for goal development and progress monitoring.
What a PLOP Is Not
A PLOP is not vague, subjective, or based on opinion — even though many end up written that way.
Have you ever seen statements like the following?
- Maria has difficulty reading grade-level text.
- John has trouble following classroom rules.
- Martin gets along well with some peers.
These may sound informative, but they don’t actually tell the team anything useful. How much difficulty? How often? Under what conditions? Compared to what expectation? Without specifics, these statements cannot guide instruction or goal writing.
A PLOP is also not just a list of test scores. While assessment data is important, it must be explained in a way that connects to real-life functioning in the classroom. Numbers without context don’t help teachers know what to do next.
Additionally, contradictory statements weaken a PLOP. If a document says a student has “limited mobility” but also states they have “good range of motion,” the team is left confused about the student’s actual needs. Clarity matters.
Quality of the PLOP Matters
The entire IEP should be built on the PLOP. Goals should directly address needs identified in the PLOP. Services should align with those goals. Accommodations should be based on what the PLOP tells us about how the student learns best.
When PLOPs are vague, goals tend to be vague. When goals are vague, progress becomes hard to measure. And when progress is hard to measure, students are the ones who suffer.
Strong PLOPs, on the other hand, create a shared understanding. They help the team collaborate more effectively, make better instructional decisions, and monitor progress with purpose.
More Weak vs. Strong PLOP Statements
Weak:
The student struggles with math.
Stronger:
The student correctly solves single-digit addition problems with 80% accuracy but struggles with multi-digit subtraction that requires regrouping.
Weak:
The student has poor attention.
Stronger:
During independent work, the student remains engaged for approximately 3–4 minutes before requiring adult redirection to return to task.
Weak:
The student is below grade level in writing.
Stronger:
The student writes complete simple sentences with correct capitalization and punctuation but struggles to expand ideas beyond one to two sentences per paragraph.
These follow the same pattern as strong examples: observable, specific, and actionable.
The PLOP Tells A Story
A PLOP should tell a clear, accurate story about who the student is as a learner right now. It should be grounded in data, written with precision, and detailed enough to naturally guide instruction and goal development.
When written well, the PLOP becomes more than a required section of the IEP — it becomes the foundation for meaningful support, effective teaching, and strong advocacy.
Writing IEPs doesn’t have to be overwhelming! The Intentional IEP gives you the tools, training, and resources to turn IEP chaos into clarity. With access to 10,000+ data-backed, standards-aligned goals, expert-led trainings, and ready-to-use data collection tools, you’ll save time, reduce stress, and feel confident in every IEP you write. Join today and transform your IEP process!